2019年4月2日 星期二

政三B 蘇郁珊(4)

政三B 蘇郁珊 05114255
1 April 2019
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47776512

Brexit: What just happened?


Members of Parliament have again rejected all the options placed before them, as they tried to find a compromise that would help end the Brexit impasse.
The rejections came during a second round of votes in the House of Commons on alternative proposals to Prime Minister Theresa May's Brexit deal.
Mrs May's deal has been rejected on three separate occasions so far. The Commons has been attempting to find a strategy that can gain majority support.

**What did MPs reject?

The second series of votes on Brexit options - known as "indicative" votes, designed to see what MPs might support amid the deadlock - were held on Monday evening in the House of Commons, the main decision-making body of the UK Parliament, following hours of debate.
MPs rejected all four votes committing the government to:
  • negotiating "a permanent and comprehensive UK-wide customs union with the EU" as part of any Brexit deal 
  • joining the European Free Trade Association (Efta) and remaining in the European Economic Area (EEA)
  • giving the public a vote to approve any Brexit deal passed by Parliament before it could be implemented
  • a series of steps to prevent the UK leaving the EU without a deal, including a final vote on whether to scrap Brexit altogether
The option that came closest to being passed, which was defeated by just three votes, was remaining in a customs union with the EU - a key plank of the so-called "soft Brexit" option, under which the UK would leave the EU but retain very close trading links with the bloc.
Its supporters say it would mitigate the damage caused to the British economy by Brexit, particularly if combined with staying in the EU's single market.
Detractors say such an option in effect means not really leaving at all, as the UK would be subject to EU rules and regulations it had no say over. A customs union would also limit the UK's ability to strike its own trade deals with non-EU countries.
Nick Boles, the Conservative MP who proposed the Efta/EEA motion - the so-called "Common Market 2.0" option - resigned from the party immediately after the vote results were announced.
Mrs May and her government would not have been obliged to act on any of the MPs' decisions - even if they were passed by a majority - as they do not have the force of law.
However, the prime minister is under pressure to chart a new course after failing to get the withdrawal agreement her government has negotiated with the EU passed by the Commons on three separate occasions.
She has gone so far as to say she will step down if her deal gets through the Commons.
Her Cabinet is scheduled to hold a mammoth five-hour meeting on Tuesday.

**What happens next?

Mrs May is said to be considering bringing her withdrawal agreement for a fourth vote, as the result of the third was closer than the previous two. But MPs still rejected it by 344 to 286, a majority of 58.
Whether there will be another attempt to find a majority for one of the options - a move supported by Leader of the Opposition Jeremy Corbyn - to then allow a "run-off" vote between that option and Mrs May's deal is unclear.
If nothing is passed by the Commons, Britain is due to leave the EU without a deal on 12 April. Many MPs and business leaders fear a no-deal or "hard" Brexit could cause chaos, at least in the short term.
Although a no-deal exit has been regarded as unlikely, given the opposition of most MPs, by what method this can be avoided - and even who will be in charge of the process - is uncertain. Many in the EU now regard a "no deal" Brexit on 12 April as the most likely outcome.
If MPs pass Mrs May's deal, Britain would have until 22 May to leave - after the EU granted an extension to the original exit date of 29 March.
Any later than that - for, say, a general election to create a new House of Commons that would possibly be able to break the deadlock - would require the EU to agree on a lengthy extension of the period before Britain is due to leave the bloc.
The EU says a further extension is only possible if the UK takes part in elections to the European Parliament on 23 May. Mrs May has previously said she does not wish the UK to take part in those elections.
The European Council - the main decision-making body of the EU, made up of the leaders of member states - is due to meet on 10 April, to decide - if necessary - whether the conditions for a longer delay have been met.
There is a third option: the UK could revoke the so-called Article 50 and cancel Brexit altogether - but this appears very unlikely.

**How did we get here?

Monday's votes were the second round of a process that got under way last week after Mrs May's government was defeated in a vote that allowed MPs to seize control of business in the chamber from the government for two days.
Last Wednesday, eight Brexit alternatives were all rejected, but Monday's second round was scheduled amid suggestions there could be majority support for at least one of them. Four of the eight new options proposed on Monday were selected by Commons Speaker John Bercow.
The third defeat of Mrs May's agreement came last Friday.

**Are we anywhere near the end of all this?

As with much else in this saga, that remains unclear.
Whether Mrs May will still be PM over the next few weeks is also up in the air. She pledged to stand down if her deal passed, but many now question whether she has the authority to stay if it doesn't.
It is worth remembering that the debate now is focused on the terms of the UK's exit from the EU. The conditions of the future relationship between the country and the bloc, assuming the UK leaves at all, still have to be negotiated.
Massive uncertainty for people and businesses in Britain and the wider EU remains.

中文重點:
英國國會議員反對了四個賦予政府的投票,包括:
一、作為脫歐協議的一部分,進行與歐盟建立永久和全面的英國關稅同盟之談判。
二、加入歐洲自由貿易聯盟(Efta)並留在歐洲經濟區(EEA)。
三、舉行國會通過、未施行之脫歐協議公投。
四、一系列措施阻止英國在沒有達成協議的情況下離開歐盟,包括最終決定是否完全廢除英國退歐。
四項投票內容,BBC媒體認為最有可能會通過的是第一項與歐盟建立永久的關稅聯盟談判。這項投票又稱為「軟脫歐」,表示英國的貿易或許不會因為脫歐產生重大影響。

政四A 劉力豪 (4)

系級 : 政四A
姓名 : 劉力豪
學號 : 04114140

出處 : https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47756368
時間 : 2019/04/01

標題 :

Zuzana Caputova becomes Slovakia's first female president

新聞內容 :
Anti-corruption candidate Zuzana Caputova has won Slovakia's presidential election, making her the country's first female head of state.
Ms Caputova, who has almost no political experience, defeated high-profile diplomat Maros Sefcovic, nominated by the governing party, in a second round run-off vote on Saturday.
She framed the election as a struggle between good and evil.
The election follows the murder of an investigative journalist last year.
Jan Kuciak was looking into links between politicians and organised crime when he was shot at home alongside his fiancée in February 2018.
Ms Caputova cited Mr Kuciak's murder as one of the reasons she decided to run for president, which is a largely ceremonial role.
She won 58% of the vote, with Mr Sefcovic trailing on 42%.
Her opponent was nominated by the ruling Smer-SD party, which is led by Robert Fico, who was forced to resign as prime minister following the killings.
Ms Caputova gained national prominence as a lawyer when she led a case against an illegal landfill lasting 14 years.
Aged 45, a divorcee and mother of two, she is a member of the liberal Progressive Slovakia party, which has no seats in parliament.
In a country where same-sex marriage and adoption is not yet legal, her liberal views have seen her promote LGBTQ+ rights.
The opponent she defeated, Mr Sefcovic, is vice president of the European Commission.
In the first round, Ms Caputova won 40% of the vote, with Mr Sefcovic gaining less than 19%.
Several heads of state - including those of neighbouring Austria and Ukraine - have expressed their support for Ms Caputova on social media.
She will be sworn in on 15 June when Slovakia's current president, Andrej Kiska, finishes his term of office. 


心得 :
斯洛伐克為議會制國家,因此最高行政首長為總理。而總統則為人民直選產生之國家元首,主要擔任象徵性質之職務,但握有總理提名權及法案否決權,因此仍具有十分的政治影響力。總統大選為兩輪決選制,近日總統大選結果由女性參選人查普托娃 (Zuzana Caputova) 在第二輪以58%的得票率,成為斯洛伐克新任總統,也是斯洛伐克首任女性總統。

查普托娃為一名律師,同時為非政府組織的倡議人士,長年活耀於社會運動,不僅對於環保相關議題有深入的探討,在尚未開放同性婚姻的斯洛伐克,她更對於同性婚姻與人權議題表達強烈的支持態度。在政治方面,查普托娃所加入的斯洛伐克進步黨,在其宣布參選總統時,仍是一個沒有任何議會席次之政黨,因此可以看的出來查普托娃確實並無太多的政治經驗。


如新聞報導所述,查普托娃將這場總統選戰視為 "a struggle between good and evil",是因為一場發生在斯洛伐克,震驚全歐洲的記者謀殺案。在2018年的二月,斯洛伐克的一名記者庫奇亞克 (Jan Kuciak) 與其女友在住家內遭到謀殺,引人注目的焦點為庫奇亞克在過往專門於報導政府黑幕醜聞,在被謀殺的時候正調查著政府官員和義大利黑手黨之間的利益連結,因此普遍的被視為是遭到相關人士的謀殺。

起初,政府方面想要透過掩蓋消息來平息事件,沒想到引起了更多群眾的不滿,走上街頭抗爭,使示威抗議的規模迅速擴大,促使當時的總理菲佐 (Robert Fico) 下台負政治責任。而查普托娃也在領導示威抗議中順勢拉抬了聲望,讓人民開始注意到這名抗議政府不公義的候選人,因此對抗邪惡便成為查普托娃的競選口號。

在競選過程中,由於獲得許多政壇人士的支持,尤其是聲望最高的時任總統基斯卡 (Andrej Kiska) 在宣布放棄爭取連任後,公開選擇支持查普托娃,使得查普托娃迅速成為支持度最高之候選人,也在大選中順利打敗對手塞夫喬維奇 (Maros Sefcovic),順利成為斯洛伐克的下一任總統。

查普托娃的當選,可以視為斯洛伐克選民對於其意識形態立場之支持,包括著反貪腐、支持婚姻平權、以及最重要的反民粹主義。不同於歐洲多國現今盛行的民粹主義與疑歐主義,大選的結果讓全世界看到斯洛伐克選擇了溫和且務實的查普托娃,而非對難民及同性議題持強硬立場的塞夫喬維奇。

但我認為查普托娃仍須面對自身政治經驗不足的問題,畢竟總統為一國之元首,勢必對於國防外交與內政穩定要有充分的研究與掌控,才能夠使國家可以往正確的方向前進,而不是僅透過未來展望與口號理念來治理國家。

 政三B 張簡翊辰(4)

 法中簽署400億歐元貿易協議

法國2019.03.26
中華民國外交部國際新聞讀報站

http://internationalnewsstation.tw/?event_area=europe


法國總統馬克宏25日接待來訪的中國國家主席習近平,雙方簽署15項貿易協議,價值約400億歐元。不過,對於習近平大力推廣的「一帶一路」計畫,法國方面仍抱持懷疑態度。馬克宏表示,「一帶一路」必須雙方互惠,也就是說中國大陸必須擴大市場准入、改善經商環境並促進公平競爭。馬克宏希望歐洲能形成統一陣線,以對抗中國大陸在貿易和技術領域的野心。兩人26日將與德國總理梅克爾和歐盟執委會主席容克舉行進一步會談。

2019年4月1日 星期一

侯佳妤(4)

政三A
05114139
侯佳妤

出處:http://trad.cn.rfi.fr/%E6%AD%90%E6%B4%B2/20190401-%E8%8B%B1%E5%9C%8B%E8%84%AB%E6%AD%90%E8%AD%B0%E6%9C%83%E4%BB%8A%E5%86%8D%E8%A1%A8%E6%B1%BA-%E6%AD%90%E7%9B%9F%E7%96%91%E5%BF%8D%E7%84%A1%E5%8F%AF%E5%BF%8D

英國脫歐議會今再表決 歐盟疑忍無可忍


英國議會今天再就脫歐舉行議會表決。英國議會此前已經3次否決了與歐洲聯盟的脫歐協議。今天的表決,是另一種替代選擇,對9項捆綁脫歐議題投票。此替代方案,與前次被否決的8項相同的方案大同小異。歐盟執委會主席榮克警告,歐盟的耐性已快被磨光,他還敦促倫敦當局最好在數小時或數日之內,對脫歐協議做出決定。
英國議會今天對首相特蕾莎梅的脫歐協議替代方案舉行第二輪指示性投票,以尋求化解脫歐僵局。據媒體指英國保守黨議員的意見仍嚴重分歧,特蕾莎梅政府仍然瀕臨下台危機。英國政府內留歐派和脫歐派內閣成員都以辭職相逼。特蕾莎梅本人已經以辭職壓上賭檯。
據報道說,英國國會主席上月27日在國會議員提交的16個選項中選出八項進行投票,但所有替代方案全軍覆沒,沒有任何提案獲得多數支持。英國國會今天將提出九項提案,大部分與上周相差無幾。投票定在倫敦時間下午三點左右公布投票選項,其中包括無協議脫歐、關稅同盟、工黨脫歐計畫、撤回里斯本條約及再次公投確認國會通過的共9項選項等。
英國議會今天再次投票沒有給歐洲聯盟帶來鼓舞。因為英國內部分歧,悲觀情緒再次瀰漫。據法新社說,歐盟抱怨耐性已磨光,希望英國快點了斷決定下一步。
據歐盟執委會主席榮科星期天稍晚警告,歐盟的耐性已快被磨光,他敦促倫敦當局最好在數小時或數日之內,對脫歐協議做出決定。
法新社說,在國會3度否決首相梅伊的脫歐協議後,英國現面臨2周後恐無協議脫歐的風險。
據榮克昨天接受意大利國家電視台(RAI)訪問時說:“我們對英國朋友一直很有耐性,但耐性是有限度的,現在已快被磨光了。”就英國國會上周表決8套因應脫歐的相關劇本但無一過關,榮克對此無奈地說:“到目前為止,我們只看到他們這不要那不要,卻沒看到他們到底要怎樣”。
報道說,在被問及英國二次脫歐公投是否可行時,榮科表示“這是英國人自己的問題,我們不能對他們想走的路說教,他們必須自己決定結束這一切的方式”。
據評論說,如果英國國會今天投票結果仍然是沒有任何替代案通過,意味英國前景將更加混沌,可能的發展為4月12日進行硬脫歐、延遲脫歐,或是對脫歐進行二次公投。

心得:
英國脫歐的議題我認為已經進入白熱化的階段,無論是英國國內民眾抑或是政府官員,都無法來好好解決脫歐問題。問認為從英國脫歐公投這事件當中,我們可以看到了民主制度一個很大的缺陷。
「公民投票」在民主制度當中被視為是神聖的一個直接反應公民意志的管道,但是公投的過程當中,若選民缺乏判斷力而造成公投結果將對國內導致重大影響時,國家未來無論是在決策方面或是行使公權力方面勢必會面臨到極大的運行困難。現在英國國內也有多支持二次公投的聲浪,但是在民主程序當中,二次公投是不太被接受的(同個議題一直投票,沒完沒了)。
在這個全球化的時代,任何一個國家國內發生的任何事情,全球都不能置身事外,否則將引起蝴蝶效應。依我之見,我認為英國還是果斷的脫歐吧!讓國內民眾一個教訓,以後在公投時別意氣用事,逞衣食口舌之快,造成國家發展面臨重大影響。民主國家也必須以英國脫歐事件來做為省思民主制度的弊端,是否有更好的方式來解決?或是從國內教育先做起? 我們也必須意識到,做決定的每個當下都是會直接影響到國家經濟社會發展的。

政三B 施軒弘(4)

系級:政三B
姓名:施軒弘
學號:05114250

歐盟耐性快磨光 要英國快決定脫歐下一步

2019.4.1

出處:https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201904010104.aspx


(中央社羅馬/柏林31日綜合外電報導)歐盟執委會主席榮科今天警告,歐盟的耐性已快被磨光,還敦促倫敦當局最好在數小時或數日之內,對脫歐協議做出決定。
在啟程訪問羅馬前夕,榮科(Jean-Claude Juncker)今天接受義大利國家電視台(RAI)訪問時說:「我們對英國朋友一直很有耐性,但耐性是有限度的,現在已快被磨光了。」
榮科除了說出「希望英國在數小時或數日之內能達成協議」的重話,還說「若拿斯芬克斯(Sphinx,希臘神話裡的獅身怪,會出難解的謎擾人)跟英國來比,前者就像一本翻開的書般一目了然」諷刺英國讓人搞不懂到底想要什麼。
被問及英國二次脫歐公投是否可行時,榮科表示「這是英國人自己的問題,我們不能對他們想走的路說教,他們必須自己決定結束這一切的方式」。
包含德國總理梅克爾(Angela Merkel)等歐洲各國領袖都在紛紛尋找方法,以保護歐盟免於掃到英國無協議脫歐所帶來政治混亂局面的颱風尾。歐盟將在4/10於布魯塞爾舉行歐盟高峰會,同時也讓英國有多一週的時間,決定下一步怎麼走。
德國的「南德日報」(Seuddeutsche Zeitung)報導,即便英國未來走上無協議脫歐,德國政府仍打算讓英國公民與家屬能繼續留在德國境內。
根據英國首相梅伊與歐盟達成的脫歐協議,10萬名現居德國的英國人在失去歐盟成員身分後,仍能留在當地。但這份協議卻三度遭英國國會否決,讓歐盟各國積極籌備各項因應,以防萬一英國走上無協議脫歐。
根據一份德國聯邦政府發給各邦的文件顯示,即便真的出現無協議脫歐,英國公民和家屬仍被允許留在德國,但他們必須申請新的許可證。(譯者:吳昇鴻/核稿:陳亦偉)1080401
心得:脫歐的鐘聲已響起,但英國自身仍然未處理好各項事務,而歐盟是否會同意英國延遲脫歐,單就從前的強硬態度實在難以預先判斷,而不論是經濟、就業,最大受影響的仍然是英國公民與其他歐盟成員國之間的關係,硬脫歐代表其之前所享有的權利將一併喪失且沒有替代方案。因此不論政府與議院如何反覆斡旋時程,再拖下去受害最大的仍然是自己的人民。

政三B 黃崇恩(4)

系級:政三B
學號:05114249
姓名:黃崇恩

出處:http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/19/3/31/n11153077.htm
時間:2019/3/31

斯洛伐克大選 反腐律師成首位女總統


斯洛伐克週六(3月30日)舉行大選,反腐律師蘇珊娜·查普托娃(Zuzana Caputova)一舉當選為該國首位女總統。
政治素人查普托娃進入政界僅一年的時間,持親歐立場。她是進步斯洛伐克黨(Progressive Slovakia)創始人之一。
在週六的大選中,查普托娃以58.4%的得票率擊敗對手、歐盟執委會副主席馬羅什·謝夫喬維奇(Maros Sefcovic)。謝夫喬維奇的得票率為41.6%。
謝夫喬維奇是一位資深外交官,立場同樣親歐,這次在執政黨方向黨,又稱社會民主黨(Smer)的支持下參與大選。方向黨是斯洛伐克國會最大政治團體,自2006年支配斯洛伐克政壇至今。
斯洛伐克選民對貪腐的厭倦,並追求國家政治風格的改變,這一切促成缺乏政治背景、但倡導反腐的查普托娃獲勝。
查普托娃以「反對邪惡」為競選口號,並承諾打擊「腐敗、濫用權力和極端主義等」。
大選後,查普托娃表達了對選民的謝意。她說:「這次競選表明,人道、團結和真理等價值觀對很多斯洛伐克人來說是重要的。正是因為這個,我今天能夠站在這裡。」
55歲IT技術人員史垂塞克(Oliver Strycek)認為,查普托娃缺乏政治背景的特質讓人耳目一新,「我在政治圈內看不到任何一個值得信賴的人,連反對派陣營也找不到」。
布拉迪斯拉發政策研究所(Bratislava Policy Institute)的項目主任米哈爾·瓦斯卡(Michal Vasecka)說,查普托娃的勝利對中歐來說是一個重要信號,那就是,這些中歐國家並沒有失去西方價值觀。一些國家仍在為維護這些價值觀而戰。
「這個國家正在急切可望改變,我認為去年春天的悲慘事件使我們跌入谷底。 人們希望向前邁進,」來自進步斯洛伐克黨的馬丁·杜貝奇(Martin Dubeci)說。「正義對斯洛伐克人民來說是一個如此重要的議題。查普托娃女士能夠建立一個圍繞她的價值觀的聯盟,這與我們之前在斯洛伐克看到的不同。」
查普托娃大學畢業後長期擔任律師,曾因一樁垃圾填埋場案件獲得2016年戈德曼環境獎。2017年12月,她參與創建了進步斯洛伐克黨。2018年1月,查普托娃宣布參選斯洛伐克總統。

2018年2月,在斯洛伐克記者揚·庫恰克(Jan Kuciak)謀殺案發生後,查普托娃呼籲民眾上街遊行,她的聲望也隨之得到提升。庫恰克死前曾致力於欺詐案調查,該案牽扯了斯洛伐克高層人物和意大利黑手黨。
心得:選民對於檯面上政治人物充滿著不信任,且多認為他們跟貪腐脫不了關係,突然出現一個年輕有活力且強力打擊貪腐的候選人,令斯洛伐克的選民耳目一新,認為他可以改變政壇的風氣。

政四A 李靜珊(4)

系級:政四A
學號:04114133
姓名:李靜珊

時間:2019/3/31
標題:「與中國打交道別太天真!」防止中國「搶購狂潮」 歐盟執委會主席參選人警告:一帶一路暗藏政治動機

內文:
歐盟執委會主席職位競選人之一30日警告說,歐盟應該防止中國企業在歐洲購買戰略性資產的「搶購狂潮」。保守黨派歐洲人民黨(EPP)的議會領袖韋伯(Manfred Weber)認為,歐盟在與中國打交道時不要太天真。韋伯在接受《世界報》採訪時說,「國家資助的中國企業進行搶購之際,歐盟今後應該逐一打擊。

4月9日將在布魯塞爾舉辦中歐峰會,中歐經濟關系成為熱門話題。歐盟28國中的部分國家呼籲聯合起來應對中國,但是另外一些國家卻為了投資討好中國。中國與歐盟成員國簽署了與歐盟政策不協調的雙邊協議,以此阻止歐盟各國在談判中組成統一戰線。例如,盡管歐盟其他成員國表示反對。

本周早些時候,德國的歐盟委員厄廷格(Günther Oettinger)呼籲歐盟對中國企圖控制歐洲基礎設施的的項目行使否決權。與此同時,歐洲委員會最近稱中國既是經濟競爭者,也是「系統性對手」(systemic rival)。

韋伯有可能在今年5月的歐洲議會選舉中獲勝,取代容克成為歐委會主席。他警告說,中國的一帶一路項目背後藏有政治動機,意在將參與國家與中國捆綁。歐盟成員國不應該被允許因為經濟合作而在其他方面受到影響,比如外交事務。他說歐盟亟需應對中國的共同策略。

韋伯說,中國和美國的貿易爭端為歐洲提供了「政治力量」。這種力量應該被運用到與中國的談判中來。在別的方面,韋伯希望向中國施壓,令其開放更多公共采購。他認為中國市場對歐洲企業處於」完全封閉」狀態,只有在需要歐洲技術的時候,中國才會允許歐洲企業入場。「如果情況沒有改變,(歐盟的)相關法律可以將中國供應商排除在公共采購之外。」韋伯說。